On March 17, 2023, in the context of the situation in Ukraine, the Pre-Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for two individuals: Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, President of the Russian Federation, and Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova, Commissioner for Children’s Rights in the Office of the President of the Russian Federation.
Both individuals are allegedly responsible for the war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) and unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation, in violation of articles 8(2)(a)(vii) and 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute. The crimes were committed in Ukrainian occupied territory at least from February 24, 2022.
There are reasonable grounds to believe that each suspect bears individual criminal responsibility for the aforementioned crimes, either for committing the acts directly, jointly with others and/or through others (article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute), or for failing to exercise proper control over civilian and military subordinates who committed the acts or allowed for their commission, and who were under their effective authority and control, pursuant to superior responsibility (article 28(b) of the Rome Statute).
The warrants are currently secret to protect victims and witnesses and safeguard the investigation, but the Chamber authorized the Registry to publicly disclose their existence, the names of the suspects, the crimes for which the warrants are issued, and the modes of liability established by the Chamber, as the public awareness of the warrants may contribute to the prevention of further crimes.
These warrants were issued following applications submitted by the Prosecution on February 22, 2023.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is a permanent international criminal tribunal created to investigate and prosecute individuals accused of the most serious crimes of international concern, such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. The ICC was established in 2002 with the entry into force of the Rome Statute, which was adopted by 120 states in 1998.
The ICC is based in The Hague, Netherlands, and has jurisdiction over crimes committed by individuals from states that have ratified the Rome Statute, as well as crimes committed on the territory of those states. The ICC is a court of last resort, which means that it only prosecutes individuals when national courts are unable or unwilling to do so.
The Presidency, the Judicial Divisions, the Office of the Prosecutor, and the Registry – the ICC is made up of these four organs. The Presidency is responsible for the overall administration of the Court, while the Judicial Divisions are responsible for the adjudication of cases. The Office of the Prosecutor investigates and prosecutes cases, while the Registry provides administrative support to the Court.
Since its establishment, the ICC has handled a number of high-profile cases, some of which have had a significant impact on the international community. In this article, we will take a look at some of the most important cases the ICC has handled and their outcomes.
The Situation in Uganda
The ICC’s first investigation was into the situation in Uganda, where the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) was accused of committing war crimes and crimes against humanity. In 2005, the ICC issued arrest warrants for five top LRA leaders, including Joseph Kony. To date, only one of the five individuals has been apprehended and brought to trial.
The Situation in Darfur, Sudan
The ICC’s second investigation was into the situation in Darfur, Sudan, where government forces and allied militias were accused of committing war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide against the civilian population. The ICC issued arrest warrants for Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir and other high-ranking officials. Al-Bashir has yet to be apprehended, but two other suspects have been brought to trial.
Democratic Republic of the Congo
The ICC has been involved in several cases related to the conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), which has claimed millions of lives since the late 1990s. The ICC has issued arrest warrants for several rebel leaders and former government officials accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The Situation in the Central African Republic
In 2014, the ICC launched an investigation into the situation in the Central African Republic (CAR), where a conflict between government forces and rebel groups has resulted in widespread violence and human rights abuses. The ICC has issued arrest warrants for several individuals, including former President Francois Bozize.
The Situation in Libya
The ICC’s investigation into the situation in Libya began in 2011, following the outbreak of the civil war between government forces and opposition groups. The ICC issued arrest warrants for former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, his son Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, and the head of the Libyan intelligence service, Abdullah al-Senussi. Gaddafi was killed during the conflict, while al-Senussi was arrested and extradited to Libya. Saif al-Islam Gaddafi remains at large.
The Situation in Kenya
In 2010, the ICC launched an investigation into the post-election violence in Kenya, which claimed the lives of over 1,000 people and displaced hundreds of thousands more. The ICC indicted six Kenyan individuals, including Deputy President William Ruto and President Uhuru Kenyatta, who were accused of crimes against humanity. The charges against Ruto and Kenyatta were later dropped due to insufficient evidence, but the other four suspects were brought to trial. Two were acquitted. The other two were held guilty.
The Situation in Ivory Coast
The ICC launched an investigation into the situation in Ivory Coast in 2011, following the disputed presidential election and the resulting violence that claimed over 3,000 lives. The ICC indicted former President Laurent Gbagbo and his close ally, Charles Ble Goude, on charges of crimes against humanity. Gbagbo was acquitted in 2019, while Ble Goude was acquitted in 2018.
The Situation in Mali
The ICC launched an investigation into the situation in Mali in 2012, following the Tuareg rebellion and the subsequent military coup. The ICC indicted several individuals, including rebel leaders and former government officials, on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Two of the suspects were brought to trial and found guilty, while others remain at large.
These cases are just a few examples of the many investigations and prosecutions the ICC has undertaken since its establishment. The ICC’s work is important because it holds individuals accountable for the most serious crimes under international law and sends a message that such crimes will not go unpunished.
Critics of the ICC argue that the court is biased against African countries and that its investigations and prosecutions have disproportionately targeted African leaders. However, supporters of the ICC argue that the court is simply responding to the situations and cases that are brought to its attention, regardless of the nationality or ethnicity of the suspects.
Despite these criticisms, the ICC remains an important institution in the international justice system. The court has the potential to bring justice to victims of the most serious crimes and to deter future atrocities by sending a clear message that such crimes will not be tolerated.
There are several famous personalities associated with the International Criminal Court (ICC). Here are a few examples:
Luis Moreno Ocampo: Ocampo is an Argentine lawyer who served as the first Prosecutor of the ICC from 2003 to 2012. He played a key role in the establishment of the ICC and was responsible for leading several high-profile investigations and prosecutions during his tenure.
Fatou Bensouda: Bensouda is a Gambian lawyer who succeeded Ocampo as Prosecutor of the ICC in 2012. She has led several important investigations and prosecutions, including those related to the situation in Darfur and the situation in Libya.
Kofi Annan: Annan was the seventh Secretary-General of the United Nations and played a key role in the establishment of the ICC. He was a strong advocate for international justice and worked to promote the ICC’s mission and goals during his time at the UN.
Angelina Jolie: Jolie is an American actress, filmmaker, and human rights activist who has worked closely with the ICC to raise awareness of its work and promote its goals. She has traveled to conflict zones around the world to meet with victims of war crimes and to advocate for justice and accountability.
Desmond Tutu: Tutu is a South African Anglican cleric and human rights activist who has been a vocal supporter of the ICC. He has called for the prosecution of individuals responsible for crimes against humanity and has worked to raise awareness of the ICC’s role in promoting justice and accountability.
There have been many Indians associated with the International Criminal Court (ICC) in various capacities. Here are a few examples:
Navanethem Pillay: Pillay is a South African of Indian Tamil origin who served as a Judge on the ICC from 2003 to 2008. She also served as the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights from 2008 to 2014.
Sanji Monageng: Monageng is a judge from Botswana who served as a Judge on the ICC from 2009 to 2018. She holds dual citizenship in Botswana and India.
Raul C. Pangalangan: Pangalangan is a Filipino judge who currently serves as a Judge on the ICC. He is a graduate of the National Law School of India University in Bangalore and has taught law at several universities in India.
Gurdial Singh Nijar: Nijar is a Malaysian lawyer of Indian origin who served as a legal advisor to the ICC from 2010 to 2013. He has also served as a judge on the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.
Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi: Bishnoi is an Indian lawyer who served as the Deputy Prosecutor of the ICC from 2003 to 2008. He played a key role in several high-profile investigations and prosecutions during his tenure.
It’s worth noting that India is not a State Party to the Rome Statute, which is the treaty that established the ICC. However, India has expressed support for the ICC’s goals and has cooperated with the court in certain cases.
India is not a State Party to the Rome Statute, which is the treaty that established the International Criminal Court (ICC). There are several reasons why India has not ratified the Rome Statute and become a State Party to the ICC, including the following:
Sovereignty Concerns: India is a sovereign nation and has been reluctant to cede its jurisdiction to an international court. India has argued that the ICC’s jurisdiction could potentially infringe on its national sovereignty.
National Security Concerns: India has expressed concerns that the ICC could be used as a tool by other countries to target India’s military and political leaders for alleged crimes. India has argued that it has its own domestic legal system and that it is capable of holding its leaders accountable for any crimes they may have committed.
Definition of War Crimes: India has expressed concerns about the definition of war crimes under the Rome Statute. Specifically, India has argued that the definition of war crimes is too broad and could be used to target legitimate military operations.
Bias Concerns: India has also expressed concerns about the potential bias of the ICC. India has argued that the ICC’s focus on African countries and leaders suggests that the court is biased against developing countries and that it may be used as a tool by Western countries to target leaders from developing countries.
Despite not being a State Party to the Rome Statute, India has cooperated with the ICC in certain cases and has expressed support for the ICC’s goals of promoting international justice and accountability.
Pebble's Galaxy 
Leave a Reply